Keyword-led content plans
Every piece mapped to a verified search demand before a word is written — the same volume-checked approach used to plan this site’s own pages.
Rankings come from two things: content that deserves to rank, and enough authority for Google to believe it. This service builds both — the way that lasts.
Every piece mapped to a verified search demand before a word is written — the same volume-checked approach used to plan this site’s own pages.
Service pages, location pages and guides written for humans first and formatted so search engines and AI assistants can cite them. You approve everything pre-publish.
Local citations, digital PR, industry mentions and genuinely useful resources, supplemented by a small number of carefully vetted paid placements where they add real value. Quality and relevance over volume — every time.
The most neglected lever in SEO: making your existing pages pass authority to the pages that make you money.
Not all backlinks help, and some actively hurt. Here’s what I’ll build for you — and what I won’t touch, whatever a cheaper provider promises.
| Link type | Worth it? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Digital PR & press coverage | Yes — the best there is | Real editorial links from news sites carry the most authority and can’t be bought at scale |
| Industry & trade publications | Yes | Relevant, credible, and they send actual referral traffic as well as ranking signal |
| Local citations & directories | Yes, for local SEO | Modest ranking value each, but they confirm your name, address and phone are consistent |
| Quality guest posting | Selectively | Fine on genuine sites with real readers — worthless on “write for us” link farms |
| PBNs & bulk paid links | No — never | Against Google’s guidelines and a genuine penalty risk. Cheap now, expensive later |
| £5 “1,000 backlinks” packages | No — never | Automated spam. At best ignored, at worst it takes months of disavow work to undo |
If a provider won’t tell you exactly where a link will come from before they build it, that’s your answer.
Most providers sell one or the other. They only really work as a pair.
Nobody links to a services page. They link to the guide, the data, the tool. Publishing something genuinely worth citing is what makes link building possible at all.
A brilliant article on a site nobody references will sit on page five. Authority is what lets your content compete against bigger, older domains.
One well-linked guide can lift the money pages it points to. Most sites leak this entirely — it’s the cheapest win in the whole discipline.
Content and links compound slowly. Sometimes your money works harder elsewhere.
Content is a 6–12 month play. If the pipeline is empty right now, paid search will get you leads faster — and I’ll say so rather than sell you a retainer.
Publishing onto a site Google struggles to crawl is pouring water into a leaky bucket. Fix the technical foundations before funding content.
If the goal is forty thin articles a month, we’re a bad fit. That approach stopped working years ago and now actively signals low quality.
The best content carries your real expertise. If no one on your side has an hour a month to sense-check what I write, it’ll read like everyone else’s.
Best for businesses whose technical foundations are already sound (or freshly fixed) and whose bottleneck is authority and coverage — usually from month two or three of an engagement onwards.
Find out whether this is the right work for your website before spending a penny — an honest assessment either way.
Book a free audit